May 21, 2010

'Know Federal system' advice ; Situation unlike when Agreement was signed

The following article is on the front page of Daily Express today.
Larry Ralon
KOTA KINABALU: Sabah and Sarawak cannot really claim that the Federation of Malaysia is a partnership of three equal members, a leading academician asserted , Thursday.
He called for a change in the mindset of Sabahans in that they must understand the workings of a Federal structure.
"While some of their demands such as request for greater autonomy and a review of petroleum royalty may be justified, Sabah and Sarawak rally cannot claim that the Federation is a partnership of three equal members," Prof. Dr Ranjit Singh of Universiti Utara Malaysia's College of Law, Government and International Studies.
While this position might have had its validity when the Malaysia Agreement was signed, he said both states accepted the new Constitution of Malaysia where the Federal structure applied to all states in the country in an equal manner except for the special state rights of Sabah and Sarawak, which were in fact recognized and guaranteed.
However, he pointed out that some perceptions and orientations of both the Federal Government and Sabahans and Sarawakians pertaining to nation-building and national integration must change.
As far as the Federal Government is concerned it ought to realise that the strategies and policies for development in West Malaysia may not totally applicable to the East Malaysian states.
My remark : Finally! Someone is echoing the sentiment of people like me. Federal Government and opposition leaders will do well to take note of this. 
"These states are basically different in terms of geographical features, population distribution, ethnic composition, social organisation, religious beliefs, economic systems, political structures and historical experiences."
Dr Ranjit said this in his presentation titled "Sabah Politics/Policy and Federal-State Relations 1963-1995" at a Public Policy Seminar themed "Effective Policy, People Prosper" organised by the Cabinet and Policy Unit of the Chief Minister's Department, at Shangri-La's Tanjung Aru Resort and Spa, Thursday.
Dr Ranjit said one stark reality which either not well comprehend in West Malaysia, or more often ignored, or even psychologically rejected, is that the majority of bumiputeras in both these East Malaysian states are non-Malays - and hence non-Muslims.
My remark : Yes, majority but of course there are KadazanDusun Muslims also.
"This has often created problems relating to the extension of the special rights of the Malays and the benefits of the New Economic Policy (NEP) to the non-Malay Muslim natives on the one hand and question of political power and political leadership, on the other," he said. He said the non Malay Muslim natives of both Sarawak and Sabah have often alleged that they have been victimised, that they have not enjoyed the fruits of the NEP which have instead been diverted to the minority Malay Muslim communities of the two states.
My remark : Ah? Hello? I thought the NEP was suppose to benefit Bumiputeras overall in Malaysia, including Natives of Sabah and Sarawak, which are essentially Bumiputeras(sons of soil), regardless of religion? In West Malaysia, it is simple for you folks. A bumiputera in West Malaysia is Malay. A Malay is a Muslim and a Muslim is a Malay. If you are a Muslim or a Malay then you are a Bumiputera. 

In East Malaysia, you cannot use that simple formula. Malays are a minority here. You said it yourself that majority of bumiputeras in both these East Malaysian states are non-Malays - and hence non-Muslims. Even a leading academician got this wrong, the article on you were quite promising in the beginning but it seems your understanding is limited too. In Sabah, there are Non-Muslim Bumiputeras (or Natives like you insist on calling us as though only West Malaysians have the right to call themselves sons of soil) as there are Muslim Bumiputeras. Read the Constitution of Malaysia. 

And, are you saying that the NEP was only meant to uplift the economic status of Muslim Bumiputeras? This is indeed a revelation. Is this one of the reasons why Sabah has the highest hardcore poor ever since our Nationhood? If so, don't just talk about Non-Malay Muslims natives lamenting about not benefiting from the NEP, Non-Malay Non-Muslim natives were also screwed. What happened to the Special Position of the Natives in Sabah as enshrined in the Constitution?  
Similarly, he said the political history in the two states from 1963 to 1990 had shown that the non-Malay Muslim natives aspire for political leadership and domination in the respective states based on the belief that the majority population should hold the reins of power in a democracy.
He said the Federal view and position, however, has been either in favour of shared power (based on the West Malaysian model) or tacit support for Malay Muslim political leadership.

'Permanent solution' due to Pairin: Prof
"In both Sarawak and Sabah however the attempts by both 'Dayak Nationalism' and 'Kadazandusun Nationalism' for political domination have been snuffed out progressively and systematically by the Federal and State Malay Muslim-led governments...the inherent disunity amongst the Dayak and Kadazandusun communities has also greatly aided the process," said Dr Ranjit.
But he  said in a broader sense, what has transpired in Sabah and between Sabah and the Federal Government since independence is a reflection of the general trend and phenomena in the region...the search for more ideal, viable and stable political formulas.
Dr Ranjit said this search is still ongoing and the formulas sought must be in accord with national aspirations, must be able to fulfill the demands of nation-building and, in particular case, also of national integration.
"Sabahans have been particularly protective of their state rights and state autonomy, while the Federal Government has been trying to increase federal control for greater integration and conformity." he said.
He said form 1963 to 1990 the Federal Government was willing to tolerate some recalcitrance on the part of the Sabahans, but Datuk Joseph Pairin Kitingan's decision in 1990 to cross the "rubicon" by withdrawing from the Barisan Nasional at a crucial point of time made the Federal Government decide on a "permanent solution" for Sabah, that is the introduction of Umno and the control of state politics by "proxy-control".
My remark : You said "non-Malay Muslim natives aspire for political leadership and domination" and "tacit support for Malay Muslim political leadership". You suggest that Umno's entry into Sabah was due to Pairin. Erh....? Pairin was not a Muslim. He is a Bumiputera who happens to be Catholic . Either the reporter misunderstood you or you don't know that your facts are wrong. Leading academician indeed.  
The whole process of experimentation and readjustments, however, augurs well for ethnic coexistence in the state and for national integration, he said.
My remark : You made it sound like we have serious racial or ethnic problem in Sabah prior to Umno's gaining foothold here. You want to preach coexistence, go back to West Malaysia and preach there. We Sabahans are actually worried that West Malaysia's style of race and religion based politic gaining a foothold here. You are trying to preach to the master of coexistence and the embodiment of the spirit of 1Malaysia. 

The only time that there was rioting and violence in Sabah was when Parti Bersatu Sabah(PBS), led by Pairin, toppled the then state government under Berjaya which was a component of Barisan Nasional. These numbskull politicians couldn't and wouldn't accept the choice of the rakyat of Sabah. Hence, the rioting.  

When  PBS was toppled via the despicable act of leap frogging, did you see any rioting? What does that say to you? 
"One perceptible change that has transpired is that the proponents of Kadazandusun nationalism have reconciled to the realities of the power equation in the State," he said.
He predicted that this change in the political domain will greatly improve federal-state relations and inter-ethnic perceptions.
He said it is hoped that these changes will also bring about a reciprocal change in development policies as well as the extension of full bumiputera benefits to these communities so that their economic, social and educational position is somewhat elevated and they can be meaningfully brought into the mainstream of nation-building and national integration.
He stressed that national integration must and should be achieved through accommodation and not assimilation and in the spirit of the agreements concluded in 1963 which gave due guarantees for special state rights in Sabah.
Dr Ranjit, the author of The Making of Sabah 1865-1991, was consultant to the Foreign Affairs Ministry and was the leader of the team which prepared the I.C.J pertaining to Malaysia's sovereignty over Sipadan Island and Ligitan Island.
Follow up post : NGO disagrees with historian's view


polemic said...

I think you dont get what the academician is trying to say...all your reviews & remarks seems like you don't understand the whole articles, especially when you start to hurled negative comments... maybe its just me, but i don't get what youre trying to say...

Justin said...

Let me qualify myself. On hindsight, my remarks did sound like anti West Malaysia and Federation. That was not my intention. I sincerely apologize.

And when I said "you", I was referring to politicians, leaders and maybe thinkers alike, that have a direct or indirect influence over policies and the prevailing misconceptions about the natives of East Malaysia.

Yes, I do get what the Prof is trying to say. It's about change of mindset on the part of East Malaysians and also our Federal government to facilitate nation building and to hasten integration.

As to the other things he said about tacit support for.....The insinuation.. I won't get into that. Very contentious.

I agree with him that one of the causes that NEP failed our natives could be due to ignorance of our federal leaders towards the dynamics of East Malaysia's social, political, beliefs etc

However, in his comments about the ignorance of our leaders, he revealed that he too is somewhat ignorant.

In addressing the natives of Sabah, he only has 2 category.

1) Non Malay Muslim Natives;and
2) Malay Muslim Natives

Ominously missing, are the Non Muslim Natives or if I follow his style of categorizing, the Non Muslim Non Malay Natives? The Kadazandusun, the Rungus, the murut etc.

Unless he is using the word Malay in the context of the Malay archipelago or Nusantara. Then perhaps he covers the Kadazandusun, Rungus etc..(Correct me if I'm wrong about these ethnic falling under the Malayan category).

However, he said "majority of bumiputeras in both these East Malaysian states are non-Malays - and hence non-Muslims". Therefore, from these statement, I surmise that when he said Malay, he wasn't saying it in the context of the Malay Archipelago. Clearly he defines Kadazandusun, Rungus, Murut etc as Non Muslim Natives

While I agree with the spirit of his message, I disagree with his telling of Sabah's history and facts. I was merely pointing out his errors.

Justin said...

and yes, I have a healthy criticism of BN but I'm not necessarily pro opposition either..

Nicole Tasha said...

Justin said...

and yes, I have a healthy criticism of BN but I'm not necessarily pro opposition either..

I like that sound...

janda tua said...

If it is true, Sabah won't be sidelined in terms of development.

cakap said...

Sabah dan Sarawak tidak mendapat layanan yang setimpalnya.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...